|
1
|
- Commissioner’s Advisory Panel
- September 21, 2000
|
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
- What is the overall picture of Assistive Technology in New York State?
- SED Field Memo on Assistive Technology and its intended impact
- SETRC “State of the State
Survey”
- TRE Center Pilot Study on AT Use
- Do All students have access to trained specialists/assessment teams?
- Survey Results
- RESNA ATP List
- What do they do if they do not have access?
- “Guidelines for Assistive Technology for Service Providers in New York
State”
- RIATT@NASDSE Online Courses
- Tre Center Web page
- Mulitple Options for the Determined
- Discussion: barriers to achieving AT outcomes for integrating technology
and students with disabilities into general education classes to help
all students achieve higher standards.
|
|
4
|
- P.L. 101-476, IDEA: “any item, piece of equipment or product system,
whether acquired commercially off the shelf, modified or customized,
that is used to increase, maintain, or improve the functional
capabilities of children with disabilities.”
|
|
5
|
- Any service that directly assists a child with a disability to select,
acquire, or use an assistive technology device.” The term includes:
- evaluation of needs of child with disability
- purchase, lease, or otherwise acquire
- select, design, fit, customize, adapt, apply, retain, repair, or replace
assistive devices
- Coordinate/use other therapies or services
- training or technical assistance for child
- Training/technical assistance for professionals
|
|
6
|
- SED Field Memo on Assistive Technology SETRC “State of the State
Survey”
- TRE Center Pilot Study on AT Use
- Lifelong Services Network
- TRAID Project
|
|
7
|
- Assistive Technology is defined
as a process, not a product.
- a process of matching the student with a disability to the:
- 1) tasks & activities to be performed by the student in various
environments.
- 2) environments in which the tasks and activities are to occur
- 3) device(s) to be used . . .
- Each part of the process must be included when considering AT
- Neglect of any part places the entire process in jeopardy.
- Assures all have common frame of reference from which to provide
appropriate assistive technology to a student with a disability,
- Emphasizes individual is one who determines technology, not other way
around.
|
|
8
|
- School District Responsibility
- Criteria/Evaluation: Assistive Technology is a process, not a product.
- Qualifications
- Use Outside of School
- Transfer of Technology
- 504 Implications
- Funding
- Non-Public Schools
- Private, SS/SO Schools
- BOCES Role
- Resources
- Appendix
|
|
9
|
- Assistive technology has tremendous potential to promote equity because
it redefines what’s possible for children with disabilities, enabling
them to be more independent, self-confident, productive and integrated
into mainstream of school and society.
- Districts are mandated to make assistive technology available to all
students with disabilities.
- Technology is for all students - for students with disabilities, it may
need to be more personalized. ”The
IEP/IFSP (signed!) is a powerful tool to help educators, parents, and
students develop effective ways of putting assistive technology
solutions into educational programs which meet students’ needs and
promote an equitable environment - one in which accommodations for them
are seen as regular, normal and expected,” (RESNA, 1992).
|
|
10
|
- Most assistive technology is low in cost, but if we don’t think ahead,
the few high cost items may wreck havoc with school budgets.
- Costs depend on individual student needs & agency’s use of existing
resources.
- Know the costs of not providing Assistive Technology:
- students needs may go unmet
- less coordination of programs and services for all children
- district’s technology resources (human/material) go unused
- increased potential for hearings and their financial drain on your
district
- other . . .
|
|
11
|
- "In developing each child’s IEP, the IEP team shall consider
whether the child requires assistive technology devices and services. If
the IEP team determines that a child needs a particular device or
service (including an intervention, accommodation or other program
modification) in order to receive FAPE, the IEP team must include a
statement to that effect in the child’s IEP."
- (Federal Register, Vol. 64, No. 300.346(a)(2)(v), p. 12441and Part
200.4(d)(3)(vi) of the January, 2000 Amendments to the Part 200
Regulations of the Commissioner of Education).
|
|
12
|
- Regarding consideration of the child's AT needs in Individualized
Education Program (IEP), Section 300.346(a)(2)(v) of the regulations
adopts verbatim the statutory requirement of consideration of each
child's AT needs.
- Comments state that "in all instances, the IEP team must determine
whether an individual disabled child should receive AT, and if so, the
nature and extent of AT provided to the child."
- See 64 C.F.R. 12590.
|
|
13
|
- The district’s long range technology and special education plans,
procedures, services, and budget include Assistive Technology.
- All staff are able to appropriately “consider” students for assistive technology
services and/or devices.
- Staff are trained to integrate technology in teaching to help students
with disabilities gain skills and achieve higher standards - their own as well as the Regents’.
- AT is used to support inclusion of students with disabilities in regular
education placements
|
|
14
|
- You have access to local, regional, and national resources to help you
take control and create a desirable future for your students and
yourselves . . .
- 70% of respondents offer some type of AT service (N = 20)
- 55% plan to offer some type of AT Service in the next year
- 75% rank Awareness Issues in their top 3 training need.
- 75%would like to see more AT Course Offerings from IHE’s.
- Next steps -
|
|
15
|
- 1. change in clinical status
- 2. change in functional status
- 3. improvement in quality of life
- 4. customer satisfaction
- 5. cost, including price of equipment and time to evaluate and train
student, staff, and parents to use it.
- Jean Minkel, PT, Minkel Consulting, New Windsor, NY
|
|
16
|
- “The dollars available to pay for Assistive Technology are going to stay
the same or decrease, so there will be greater competition for that pile
of dollars. Those with good
measures in place will receive those dollars.
- A high - tech solution is not
always the best. As money becomes
less available . . . we will shift back to lower technology that can
achieve the same outcome.”
- Frank DeRuyter, Director of Speech Pathology and Audiology, Department
of Surgery, Duke University.
4/8/96
|
|
17
|
- Teams that successfully used AAC and worked in collaboration tended to:
- communicate frequently among themselves to determine needs and goals
- determine ways to facilitate use in everyday environments and to
include everyday people in its use and programming,
- anticipate future needs
- Teams with widely disparate responses often noted the need for:
- training for the student and/or everyday people,
- highlighted the need for educating about and encouraging the use of the
system
- support to develop a communication plan
|
|
18
|
- Share results with TRE Advisory Committee and seek recommendations
- Continue the study with new teams at TRE
- Enlist other Centers, Agencies, Vendors to replicate the study
- Publish results in TRE Matters newsletter
- Apply results to improving practice via State Guidelines
Dissemination”Roll Out”
|
|
19
|
- State of the State Survey Results
- RESNA ATP List for NY
- RIATT @NASDSE Training Plan
- 15 instructors - at least 1 per RSSC
- Train AT Assessment Teams as needed
- Online or the new “6 x 6’ plan.
|
|
20
|
- State Guidelines Available, Spring, ‘01
- Lifelong Services Network http://www.vesid.nysed.gov/lsn/home.html
- TRE Center Web page
- TRAID Project
- Access a wide variety of resources
|
|
21
|
- Guideline 1: District Planning, Training, and Staff Development
- Guideline 2: Evaluation of a Student’s Need for Assistive Technology
Devices & Services
- Guideline 3: Developing Recommendations for Assistive Technology
- Guideline 4: Coordinating Service Delivery
- Guideline 5: Review of Program Effectiveness
- Final Version Available Spring, 2000
|
|
22
|
- conduct and/or coordinate assistive technology staff development
opportunities with T.R.E, SETRC, Regional TRAID Centers, or other
regional providers of assistive technology services.
- Share information gleaned from a variety of current resources, including
the Internet.
- Help staff get their technology questions answered quickly and provide
information on resources for troubleshooting and problem resolution
(e.g., email)
- Use a "train the trainers" model to expand the district's
capacity to provide timely information and technical assistance to
district staff.
|
|
23
|
- Call the TRE Center for assistance, training, and resources.
- Call SETRC and/or RSSC for assistance.
- Call on National Center for Disability Services Research Training
Institute (RTI) for assistance at 516-747-5400.
- Call on other local resources for assistance: UCP, ILC, IHE
- Call the Office of Advocate for Persons with Disabilities TRAID Project:
800-522-4369
- Choose to develop your own professional development plan to learn as
much as you can about AT
|
|
24
|
- Use Guidelines for Assistive Technology to realize your vision.
- Become trained to implement the State Guidelines via NY-RIATT@NASDSE
distance education courses
- Replicate Model Practices for CPSE/CSEs (SED 2/96 Field Memo)
- Take LRE Training available from SETRC .
- Use Model Schools Program. Call
local BOCES or Lynn Reuss, SED: 518 - 474-1280
- Use Test Modifications handout for students who need & benefit from
Assistive Technology.
|
|
25
|
- Why the need for statewide training & regional expertise?
- All Students who require AT need access to AT Resource Person in their district
- Need access regionally until goal is met. Contact Local BOCES SETRC
- 20 courses available (Overview, etc.)
- Competency-based, cost-effective, accessible and offered by NY
Instructors
- Visit http://www.trecenter.org or phone
1-800-248-9873 for additional print information
|
|
26
|
- Lack of awareness of “what’s out there.”
- Lack of trained staff
- Inadequate funds
- Lack of clarity on AT as test accommodation
- Lack of access to devices for trial use
- Other?
|
|
27
|
- Can students be helped to achieve new curriculum standards if we improve
integration of technology into educational environments for children and
adults with special needs? Why or
why not?
- How can technology support integration of special education students
with their non-disabled peers?
- What is the role of the teaching assistant in regard to the student’s
use of assistive technology?
- How can we best use assistive technology to promote inclusion?
- Do I use technology as a tool? If
yes, do I provide instruction that supports students’ other curricular
materials or is it in conflict with them?
- What can I do to help reach these goals?
|
|
28
|
- Wisconsin AT Consider-ation Guide www.wati.org
- Form collaborative partnerships with other providers
- Develop an AT course for HS students
- Use the State Guidelines to do PLANNING!
|
|
29
|
|